+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 29.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.0 Pro offers 9.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $1.79 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($1.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:44.1%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:73.8%(+29.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:44.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:73.8%(+29.7%)
Providers:1