+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 24.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
7 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:44.1%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:68.4%(+24.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:44.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:68.4%(+24.3%)
Providers:0