+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 21.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 72B was created as the flagship vision-language model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding. Built with 72 billion parameters optimized for visual and textual reasoning, it represents Qwen's most capable offering for tasks requiring integrated image and language processing.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:51.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:73.2%(+21.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:51.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:73.2%(+21.4%)
Providers:0