+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B leads with 37.9% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 30B A3B offers 215.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Qwen3 30B A3B is $1.60 cheaper per million tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 30B A3B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B was created with a mixture-of-experts architecture featuring 30 billion total parameters and 3 billion active parameters. Built to provide strong capabilities with efficient inference through sparse activation, it balances performance with practical computational requirements.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($1.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Average Score:27.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:65.8%(+37.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Avg Score:27.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:65.8%(+37.9%)
Providers:3