Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 49.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking offers 90.1K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.0 Pro was developed as Google's initial production-ready multimodal model, designed to handle text and provide strong performance across diverse tasks. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it introduced the Gemini architecture to developers and enterprises.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita