+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
8 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:51.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:72.5%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:51.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:72.5%(+20.9%)
Providers:1