+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads with 18.2% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite was created as an even more efficient variant of Gemini 2.0 Flash, designed for applications where minimal latency and maximum cost-effectiveness are essential. Built to bring next-generation multimodal capabilities to resource-constrained deployments, it optimizes for speed and affordability.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2025-02-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:48.5%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Average Score:66.6%(+18.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
2024-06-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:48.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:66.6%(+18.2%)
Providers:1