+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 27B leads with 11.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 2 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.5% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in XSTest (92.6%), FLEURS (86.4%), Natural2Code (75.5%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.6%), HellaSwag (86.4%), BoolQ (84.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:28.1%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:39.5%(+11.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:28.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:39.5%(+11.4%)
Providers:0