+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 11.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
12 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.22 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:52.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:64.1%(+11.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:52.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:64.1%(+11.3%)
Providers:1