+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads with 22.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
12 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:52.8%(+22.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:30.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:52.8%(+22.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:30.7%
Providers:0