+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
12 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($0.07 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:52.8%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:68.7%(+15.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:52.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:68.7%(+15.9%)
Providers:2