+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
12 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.31 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:52.8%(+0.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:52.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:52.8%(+0.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:52.7%
Providers:1