+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:43.3%(+12.3%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:31.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:43.3%(+12.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:31.0%
Providers:0