+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-4.1 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 21.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 23.6K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $1.63 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($1.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:48.9%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:70.3%(+21.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:48.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:70.3%(+21.3%)
Providers:2