+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 5.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 912.4K more tokens in context window than GPT-4o mini. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
4 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.38 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:51.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:56.6%(+5.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:51.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:56.6%(+5.2%)
Providers:1