+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GPT-5 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 32.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 528.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-5 nano. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.08 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:38.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:71.2%(+32.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:38.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:71.2%(+32.8%)
Providers:2