+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 50.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:38.4%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:88.4%(+50.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:38.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:88.4%(+50.0%)
Providers:0