Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct leads with 6.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
6 months newer

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together