+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 943.2K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($0.40 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:52.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:71.7%(+18.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:52.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:71.7%(+18.9%)
Providers:7