+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o1. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $74.63 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
9 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($74.63 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:51.4%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:80.9%(+29.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:51.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:80.9%(+29.6%)
Providers:2