+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 39.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o3-mini. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $5.13 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30($5.13 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:48.5%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:87.5%(+39.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:48.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:87.5%(+39.0%)
Providers:2