+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads with 4.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
5 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:51.9%(+4.7%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:47.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:51.9%(+4.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:47.2%
Providers:0