+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads with 10.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
5 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:54.2%(+10.8%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:43.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:54.2%(+10.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:43.5%
Providers:0