+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.22 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:58.2%(+0.7%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Average Score:57.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:58.2%(+0.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Avg Score:57.5%
Providers:1