+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct leads with 7.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.5% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in XSTest (92.6%), FLEURS (86.4%), Natural2Code (75.5%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.9% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.7%), GSM8k (91.1%), MBPP (90.2%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.30
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($0.19 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:30.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Average Score:37.5%(+7.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:30.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:37.5%(+7.2%)
Providers:4