+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Average Score:53.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:58.6%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Avg Score:53.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:58.6%(+4.9%)
Providers:0