Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 31.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B offers 925.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is $1.28 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was developed as an ultra-compact variant of Gemini 1.5 Flash, designed to deliver multimodal capabilities with minimal resource requirements. Built for deployment scenarios where efficiency is critical, it provides a lightweight option for applications requiring fast, cost-effective AI processing.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-03-15

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
2024-10-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita