+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Gemini 2.0 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash leads with 9.3% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.0 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash was developed as the next generation of Google's fast multimodal model, designed to provide improved performance while maintaining the speed and efficiency that defines the Flash family. Built with enhanced reasoning and generation capabilities, it serves applications requiring both quality and responsiveness.
7 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-12-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($0.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:63.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Average Score:72.5%(+9.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Gemini 2.0 Flash
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Avg Score:72.5%(+9.3%)
Providers:1