+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Gemma 2 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B was developed as an open-source language model with 27 billion parameters, designed to provide researchers and developers with a capable, instruction-tuned model for experimentation and deployment. Built to democratize access to advanced language understanding, it combines strong performance with the flexibility of open-source licensing.
1 month newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Gemma 2 27B
2024-06-27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:80.8%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Average Score:65.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:80.8%(+14.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 27B
Avg Score:65.9%
Providers:0