+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 9.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 794.6K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $0.69 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($0.69 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:71.2%(+9.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:62.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:71.2%(+9.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:62.0%
Providers:1