+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 992.8K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $59.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($59.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:66.9%(+13.7%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:53.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:66.9%(+13.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:53.1%
Providers:1