+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-4 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 Turbo leads with 3.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 924.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-4 Turbo. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $39.25 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo was introduced as an optimized version of GPT-4, designed to provide enhanced performance with improved efficiency and an expanded context window. Built with updated knowledge and refined capabilities, it offered developers a more cost-effective way to leverage GPT-4's advanced reasoning while handling longer conversations and documents.
22 days newer
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI
2024-04-09
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($39.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Input:$10.00
Output:$30.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:72.9%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Average Score:76.5%(+3.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
GPT-4 Turbo
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:72.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4 Turbo
Avg Score:76.5%(+3.6%)
Providers:2