+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs GPT-4.1 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 mini leads with 10.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 mini offers 23.6K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.5 Flash. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $1.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($1.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:64.5%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Average Score:74.6%(+10.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:64.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 mini
Avg Score:74.6%(+10.1%)
Providers:2