+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:81.2%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:76.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:81.2%(+4.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:76.3%
Providers:0