+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 14.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:81.2%(+14.1%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:67.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:81.2%(+14.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:67.2%
Providers:0