+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 3.1% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
3 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:68.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:71.3%(+3.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:68.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:71.3%(+3.1%)
Providers:0