+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 34.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.8% across 22 benchmarks. It excels particularly in XSTest (97.0%), HellaSwag (86.5%), GSM8k (86.2%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (95.4%), MBPP (84.6%), MT-Bench (81.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:52.5%(+34.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:18.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:52.5%(+34.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:18.0%
Providers:0