+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 leads with 25.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
11 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:51.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:76.0%(+25.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:51.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:76.0%(+25.0%)
Providers:0