Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 800.8K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $0.72 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
4 months newer

Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra