+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 13.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 756.8K more tokens in context window than o1. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $74.25 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
7 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($74.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:72.4%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:86.3%(+13.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:72.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:86.3%(+13.9%)
Providers:2