+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 20.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
3 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:64.1%(+20.6%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:43.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:64.1%(+20.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:43.5%
Providers:0