+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 3.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 1.0M more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $0.54 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
7 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($0.54 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:72.0%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:75.8%(+3.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:72.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:75.8%(+3.8%)
Providers:1