+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 2.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 917.5K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
4 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30($0.15 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:71.3%(+2.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:68.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:71.3%(+2.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:68.9%
Providers:1