+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash leads with 3.7% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
9 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Average Score:62.3%(+3.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:58.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
1 providers
Throughput: 150 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Avg Score:62.3%(+3.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:58.6%
Providers:0