Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers 925.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $0.90 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 1.5 Flash was created as a fast and efficient multimodal model, designed to provide quick responses while handling text, images, and other modalities. Built for applications requiring low latency and high throughput, it balances capability with speed to serve real-time and high-volume use cases.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 year newer

Gemini 1.5 Flash
2024-05-01

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 1.5 Flash
2023-11-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita