+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 4.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $12.35 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($12.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:77.9%(+4.6%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:73.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:77.9%(+4.6%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:73.3%
Providers:1