+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 4B. Gemma 3 4B is $12.44 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
10 months newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Input:$0.02
Output:$0.04($12.44 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:77.9%(+15.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:62.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:77.9%(+15.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:62.0%
Providers:1