+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemma 3n E2B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 29.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B was created as a specialized efficient variant, designed for deployment in edge and mobile environments with strict resource constraints. Built with optimizations for edge computing, it brings Gemma capabilities to devices and applications where traditional models would be impractical.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Gemma 3n E2B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:85.8%(+29.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Average Score:56.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Gemma 3n E2B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:85.8%(+29.0%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B
Avg Score:56.8%
Providers:0