+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 21.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro was introduced as Google's advanced multimodal model with an expanded context window, designed to comprehend and reason across long documents, videos, and audio. Built to handle complex, information-rich tasks, it brought breakthrough capabilities in processing extended context while maintaining high-quality reasoning and generation.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:78.0%(+21.9%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:56.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:78.0%(+21.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:56.1%
Providers:0