+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads with 23.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 1.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 1.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.6% across 23 benchmarks. It excels particularly in XSTest (98.8%), HellaSwag (93.3%), GSM8k (90.8%). With a 2.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2024-05-01
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 35 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Average Score:47.7%(+23.4%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:24.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 1.5 Pro
2023-11-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Avg Score:47.7%(+23.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:24.3%
Providers:0